Sunday 27 January 2013

Context of Practice: Essay Draft

How has consumer culture and the media objectified people and changed society?

It could be said that people are products of the society that they are born into and with the emergence of consumer culture as old as the first civilisations (Ancient Egypt, Babylon and Ancient Rome) it could be argued to of transformed society into objectifying peoples identity’s based on there consumerism, especially in the current, with a heavy influence from the media. Consumer culture is where the buying and spending of the consumers define the economy; this culture is driven by money and how buying and owning your own property can attain happiness where your wants and needs are met. However consumer culture has become consumption for its own sake through mass media and the promises of consumer culture not being met for consumers. Instead of it fulfilling spiritual or aesthetic desires it creates empty promises that leave the consumers more depressed and insecure. This culture has consumed us and has led to the objectification of people in society where they become a product of consumer culture through there consumerism.

As Kalle Lasn writes in Culture Jam (2000),

‘We are being manipulated in the most insidious way. Our emotions, personalities and core values are under siege from media and cultural forces too complex to decode. A continuous product message has woven itself into the very fabric of our existence.’ (P.xiii)

the culture has become part of us, our coding, and we are no longer in control. Everything we eat, touch and wear has a label attached to it, which is a semantic, so in turn immediately links to an image, a value, a common understanding in which you are therefore judged on. For example the Apple brand, if you are to have a macbook, iphone, ipad etc. the brand connotations are attached to you. You are sleek, innovative, young, good quality, expensive, clean, an iperson: as Lasn wrote, ‘We ourselves have been branded.’ (Lasn, 2000, p.xiii). We have effectively become an object determined by what we wear, what we drive, what we listen to and ultimately what the media and culture say we are.

One of the main protagonists within the media that enforces this nature of society is advertising. John Berger’s 1972 series of 'Ways of seeing' shown on the BBC opens with a very strong representation of the medias creation with a very similar viewpoint as to that of Lasn:

"In our urban world, on the streets that we walk, the buses that we take, in the magazines that we read, on walls, on screens, we are surrounded by images of an alternative way of life. We may remember or forget theses images, but briefly we take them in and they stimulate our imagination either by way of memory or anticipation - where is this other way of life?"
                                                                                                                           
He explains that the culture in which we live in is constantly challenged by a fantasy displayed in the media that we aim towards by participating in consumerism. The door to this fantasy we long for is the object we desire and the media fool us repeatedly into thinking that object will transform our identity and we can become those we envy in the images through consumption of the products. As a result our identity is branded by what we own in the life we do live in and we are constantly judged on them against the images in the media to place our gender, age, sexuality and in particular our social status in society. Lasn’s theory wrote in 2000 on consumer culture expresses similar views as what Berger could touch upon in 1972. We have now become so immersed in consumer culture that ‘Most of us are now fully detached from the natural world’ (Lasn, 2000, P4) and it has caused this knock on effect where we brand ourselves by what we buy unconsciously and consciously. The media has made us want more through manipulative advertising and ‘We embrace the value of More to compensate for lives that seem, somehow, less.’ (Lasn, 2000, P11) with gratitude to the images Berger states surrounds us of the alternative way of life and encourages the fantasy of the ideal of gaining the life the false image in the media portrays. Lasn explains that ‘the most powerful narcotic in the world is the promise of belonging.’ (Lasn, 2000, P.xiii) and that this is best achieved by conforming to the prescriptions of society. With the narcotic of belonging numbing the lives that appear somehow less to those we witness in the media, being on every corner for the right price there is a ‘manipulative corporate ethos’ (Lasn, 2000, P.xiii) driving our culture. It’s highly addictive and short-lived but it is indispensible and endless.

Lasn focus is on America but his theory speaks for consumer culture in general when he writes ‘culture is no longer created by the people.’ (Lasn, 2000, P.xiii). It is no longer what stories are passed through generations that create our culture and whom we are but we are now told by corporations with ‘something to sell as well as to tell’ (Lasn, 2000, P.xiii), a story. Are culture is now the spectacles that surround the production of culture such as brands, celebrities and fashions and we are to listen, watch and based on that, to buy. There is no room for authenticity or spontaneity; the media and consumer culture have tamed the human spirit to be an object with an identity to project an image that you are told to have, feel and behave like.

Dittmar has a very similar viewpoint on advertising in consumer culture and she explains what it is that’s causes this effect on people:

"Through the advertising and fashion industries, consumer culture presents individuals with images that contain "lifestyle and identity instructions that convey unadulterated marketplace ideologies (i.e look like this, want these things, aspire to this kind of lifestyle)" (Arnould & Thompson, 2005, P875). The symbolism inherent in consumer goods can be defined as the images of "idealized people associated with [the good]" (wright, Claiborne & Sirgy, 1992), and the message is that buyers not only consume the actual good advertised, but also its symbolic meanings (successful, happy, attractive, glamorous) thus moving closer to the ideal identity portrayed by media models."

Dittmar in the 2008 edition of Consumer Culture, Identity and Well-Being talks about how advertising and in particular the fashion industry within consumer culture tell people what they should do, feel and look like. She adds that the symbolisms within the goods are seen as ideal and the individual think they will consume when having ownership eg. successful, attractive, is through the idealized people that advertise it. The fantasy portrayed in advertising, which Berger comments on, is therefore closer because of the opportunity to gain this good the character has and to gain this ideal identity you witness and want. The significant impact this has on individuals is linked to the ideal identities that are portrayed. Advertising doesn’t just promote the products but the lifestyle and identity instructions with it, providing cultural ideals of beauty, success and happiness. The adverts present the problem that produces the self-doubt and negative emotions but also present you with a solution: buy this and it will enhance your sense of worth, in better words ‘because you’re worth it’. The productions of our culture have tapped into our emotions and from this a ‘material self’ is identified. The identity of a person is expanded beyond the body to include material goods and those are what determine the identity of a person, not themselves. The goods ‘have become modern means of acquiring, expressing and enhancing your identity’ (Dittmar, 2008, P12) and generate your social status and personality where you are constantly trying to improve yourself with hope of a better identity.

Not only does the media in consumer culture have this power of leaving us constantly wanting for a better life, identity and status but also has the power to manipulate what we in fact desire. Its power of manipulating us is through our emotions where we can be persuaded into feeling and thinking differently which inevitably leaves us not only being defined by objects we own but also subconsciously being told what objects we should and should want to be defined by. Advertising alters what we want, what we belief and what we value in life by encouraging emotions when selling objects which John Berger states in his four part series:

"Emotion is a factor in persuasive advertising that aims to change viewpoints and not simply to demonstrate the logical implications of data. In the grip of an emotion, a person not only feels differently, but also tends to think differently. Advertising that resonates emotionally stands more chance of inducing a change in beliefs and values/motives/wants/desires than one based on logic alone.” 

The emotions that would once define a person’s state now are associated with brands and objects: "Hunger equals Big Mac. Drowsiness equals Starbucks. Depression equals Prozac." (Lasn, 2000, P41). Depending on what brand you relate emotions to and react upon determines what kind of person you are and begins to define you to the rest of the world. These brands have now become forms of communication for others to acknowledge, process and judge you upon.
In modern society communication has changed, "material possessions provide people with information about other people's identities." (Lury, 2001, P8) and there is now a ‘“importance ascribed to the ownership and acquisition of material goods in achieving life goals" (Richins, 2004, P210)’ (Dittmar, 2008, p22) as a prime indicator of success to others. The key to happiness and self- definition is through your material goods as your self is made up of what you own. What you own then indicates your life achievements and how successful you are, providing the rest of society with your identity. Consumer culture has become the key to happiness and the answer to solving our emotions as well as telling us what they are. Individuals start to feel depressed by their status in society and the constant need of achievement with new possessions changing what defines success. As a result ‘You buy a house with three bathrooms. You park your BMW outside the double garage. When you grow depressed you go shopping.’ (Lasn, 2000, P55) because the only way to solve your emotion and lack of worth is through the promises the media give, people want to believe what the media believes, that you are in fact worth it. These aren’t delivered so you keep shopping in hope of happiness only for it to be short lived and disappointed.

Lasn writes how consumer culture has control of our emotions and how the constant determination to enhance our status and identity in society has also affected our social culture. Our social culture once defined individual’s identities but it is now that the consumerist cults rituals that defines them:

"The cult rituals spread themselves evenly over the calendar: Christmas, Easter, Summer Olympics, Mothers Day, Fathers Day, Halloween. Each has its own imperatives - stuff you have to buy, things you have to do." (Lasn, 2000, P55)

Due to the media encouraging consumer culture every aspect of our lives is ruled over by this degradation of being a mere object to be manipulated to consume. The narcotic of belonging is relevant again, as if you aren’t to celebrate through the products of consumerism and as the media tell you to then you are outcast as strange and are somehow unfortunate and lacking in life. What used to be events and rituals of culture from tales and history that defined us have become points of contact with even more mass consumption and economic booms for the spectacles producing culture and it this new consumption ritual that now defines us. A prime example of the mass effect of consumer culture and the medias influence is Christmas. A once religious holiday based on love and family has been transformed to one where you are to ask and receive without question to still not be satisfied and shop in the discounted sales immediately after to try gain contention. The traditional generation of culture has now been lost through the media as they dictate what beliefs, memories and activities that make up your culture should be through highly publicized imagery which people copy instead of set. People of the culture have now lost control and now ‘[The] family trip to a shopping mall is the present-day incarnation of the sacred’ (Bauman, 2004, P71) leaving the true origins of our identity and culture built over centuries being lost to consumerism.

This can be shown in particular in an advertising campaign combining of Selfridges, a high end department store that transformed the shopping experience from the early 1900’s, Mother, a massive advertising agency known for it’s ‘anti-advertising’ and a feminist, conceptual artist Barbara Kruger. Kruger created a series of work which attempted to reflect the pressures of consumption on women and to expose and challenge the notion of identity construction through acts of consumption using phrases such as ‘I shop therefore I am’. Her work was a materialistic version of René Descartes "cogito ergo sum", translation ‘I think, therefore I am’, which supports Lasn’s theory that a person is defined not by what they think but what they own through there consumption. Kruger’s art was then used as part of a three-year collaboration campaign for Selfridge’s January Sales:
 

The campaign brought the art into every day life but only with the price of having to have a company logo and sponsorship deal along side. Aiming it at a cultured middle class consumer the ‘edgy’ campaign openly expressed the emptiness at the core of the capitalist lifestyle with the joke being on the customers of Selfridges. If they aren’t to laugh along and be seen as in on the joke like the ‘educated’ and ‘cultured’ then they fear to not appear sophisticated, post-modern and media-savvy. What once was fine art that was an incorporation of phrases on the distortion of desire and corporate capitalism has been fed into the consumer culture to boost the culture for further profit and gain and actually mocks us at the same time. This is a true example of how deranged culture has become through consumption and mass media advertising. People have lost the control of culture as the media and corporations, in this example Selfridges and Mother, dictate what the culture is and places people in positions with only one direction to follow in order to stay in a status of society, laugh along with us. People aren’t to think for themselves any longer, the natural way of living is lost beyond the manufactured one and comes with waterproofing, breathable, adjustable fit for all day comfort. Every connotation of life has features and fittings to make life more ideal to live but happiness always comes with a price of consumerism. This is a depressing factor of the transformation of society and people due to consumer culture and its media but even the depression benefits them as stated earlier: ‘when you grow depressed you go shopping’ (Lasn, 2000, P55).

Not only has this loss and control of culture objectified people but also it has in fact changed society, ‘our culture has evolved into a consumer culture and we from citizens to consumers’ (Lasn, 2000, P63). Consumer culture and the media have changed us from people into an object to be aimed at to sell something, feeding our insecurities for profit and manipulating us for self-system gain. It is a violent system that seduces us and gives us a sense of security in society as ‘It is in acquiring, using and exchanging things that individuals come to have social lives.’ (Lury, 2001, P12). Without this system we would merely exist and therefore we can’t help but be controlled by the consumption. With a significant impact on individuals linking to the ideal identities that promote lifestyle and identity instructions displayed in the media and advertising it would be hard to escape the system.

Lasn doesn’t see any evidence of this changing and neither do I as now there is an Americanization of the world. American culture has been imperialized and forced upon other cultures until the cultures unify and adopt American cultures ways of thinking even when it’s not in the cultures best interest. This globalization has meant that this culture is produced to benefit and feed consumer culture and the nature of this becomes part of an individual, as it is now there culture. America’s values are broadcasted in every area of the world not only in fashion trends and design but also the media. You can be this person that the culture is saying to be and the media demonstrates this through images that tell you, you can be whoever you want to be by buying. The domination of the culture means that you want to be what you see everywhere and what you see everywhere is America. America is who lead the world in showing western values as they have control off mass media whether that is in fashion or film, the propaganda is surrounding cultures and molding them to fit the right attitudes to support consumer culture.

In conclusion there has been a clear transformation on society and the people who live within it due to consumer culture and its constant growth in the media. People have become an object of the culture as it steadily transforms every aspect of life into an object to sell and they become fully detached from the natural world and immersed with the images surrounding them instructing consumerism. Consumer culture has affected our identity, emotions, social communication and our values. It is a powerful and manipulation system which has accessed our self and been exploited for profitable gain. This system has created a constant need for wanting and a unreachable promise of satisfaction through idealized and manufactured imagery displayed in a variety of media. The world has been westernized for economic excess but in this has actually objectified people and lost the creation of culture that allows people to define themselves. Instead a replacement of depression and mass product consumption has formed as society struggles to survive amongst all the mass communication. The line between fantasy and reality has been disguised and society has begun to feel it possible to achieve their desires that are only manipulated and artificial images leaving society in despair with an unattainable goal. This is a constant fight people have in society today as they try and maintain an identity and ride the wave of consumer culture. What is more of a challenge to comprehend is how can we confront it when it’s controlling every decision we make.

Bibliography

Kalle Lasn (2000). Culture Jam. New York: Harper Collins. Pxiii.

Helga Dittmar (2008). Consumer Culture, Identity and Well-Being - The Search for the 'Good Life' and the 'Body Perfect'. East Sussex: Psychology press. P7.

Celia Lury (2001). Consumer Culture. Oxford: Polity. P8.

Bauman (2004), Identity, page 71

David B. Clarke (Editor), Marcus A. Doel (Editor), Kate M. L. Housiaux (Editor) (2003). The Consumption Reader. New York: Routledge. 

John Berger (1972) 'Ways of seeing - Advertising', Parts 1-4, BBC (www.youtube.com) 
Available from:
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mmgGT3th_oI>
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6q0JvXiZw7o>
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbebPdXv70w>
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tAJovNjXMTs>

No comments:

Post a Comment